Misty Fucking Quigley (
citizendetective) wrote2022-03-08 10:35 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
- tlv: !ic,
- tlv: aerith gainsborough,
- tlv: alexander hilbert,
- tlv: arthur lester,
- tlv: cater diamond,
- tlv: cho hakkai,
- tlv: dorian gray,
- tlv: edward deegan,
- tlv: francis crozier,
- tlv: john doe,
- tlv: jonathan strange,
- tlv: kiryu kazuma,
- tlv: lark tennant,
- tlv: mad sweeney,
- tlv: malcolm bright,
- tlv: natalie scatorccio,
- tlv: pagan min,
- tlv: pyotr verkhovensky,
- tlv: raylan givens,
- tlv: the dark urge,
- tlv: trevor belmont,
- tlv: walter tattersall,
- tlv: zhao yunlan
IC contact for
lastvoyages
[If I don't have an active post up, feel free to use this post to have your character call, videochat, text, or knock on Misty's door.]
no subject
no subject
I do think you're speaking from some experience. I always assume that. What else would you be speaking from?
no subject
no subject
I'm not telling you to discount your experience. I'm telling you as a warning because I don't want to see you do something you'll eventually regret.
no subject
no subject
no subject
[That's all she says - no more questions there.]
And how is Arthur?
no subject
no subject
no subject
As is talking to you.
I *have* missed you.
jfc self why
Re: jfc self why
We were going to talk today anyway.
no subject
I don't think it's weird, for the record. I'm just surprised that you don't.
no subject
Not to minimize the shitty thing you two did but...
We're handling it.
no subject
no subject
What do you think I've gotten angry at you about?
no subject
no subject
I talked about things I take issue with. But I want to know what you think I got angry at you for. I don't think assuming anything's been covered is a good idea. Because I only got angry once.
no subject
Because Arthur didn't like me.
no subject
Disappointed, but not angry. And not in you. I know Arthur is difficult.
I also know he's willing to forgive others. So I knew it wasn't necessarily permanent.
And before you assume: it's still not necessarily permanent.
no subject
no subject
The only time I got angry was just before the talk.
When you broke the teacup I was scared and frustrated. When you pushed me away over the file, I was frustrated and hurt.
I only got angry when you assumed I don't care about Natalie or what happened to her. That I would ever minimize something like that. When you tried to tell me what I meant and what I felt.
Maybe you weren't thinking of it that way, but it was an easy way to get out of apologizing for something shitty you did. I've apologized a lot because I know I make mistakes. You never have. And warden or inmate, that's not fair.
I do feel bad about what I said, because it was cruel. I told you before that I say awful things when I'm angry. But I don't want to apologize yet, not right now, and not after the things you've done that haven't been addressed. I wouldn't feel it.
no subject
no subject
But either we accept that we've both had reactions the other one doesn't like or we're going to remain at a standstill.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
audio
Re: audio
audio
Re: audio
audio
Re: audio
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text
text
Re: text